Show simple item record

contributor authorDoelling, David R.
contributor authorLoeb, Norman G.
contributor authorKeyes, Dennis F.
contributor authorNordeen, Michele L.
contributor authorMorstad, Daniel
contributor authorNguyen, Cathy
contributor authorWielicki, Bruce A.
contributor authorYoung, David F.
contributor authorSun, Moguo
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:24:47Z
date available2017-06-09T17:24:47Z
date copyright2013/06/01
date issued2013
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-84765.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228137
description abstracthe Clouds and the Earth?s Radiant Energy System (CERES) instruments on board the Terra and Aqua spacecraft continue to provide an unprecedented global climate record of the earth?s top-of-atmosphere (TOA) energy budget since March 2000. A critical step in determining accurate daily averaged flux involves estimating the flux between CERES Terra or Aqua overpass times. CERES employs the CERES-only (CO) and the CERES geostationary (CG) temporal interpolation methods. The CO method assumes that the cloud properties at the time of the CERES observation remain constant and that it only accounts for changes in albedo with solar zenith angle and diurnal land heating, by assuming a shape for unresolved changes in the diurnal cycle. The CG method enhances the CERES data by explicitly accounting for changes in cloud and radiation between CERES observation times using 3-hourly imager data from five geostationary (GEO) satellites. To maintain calibration traceability, GEO radiances are calibrated against Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the derived GEO fluxes are normalized to the CERES measurements. While the regional (1° latitude ? 1° longitude) monthly-mean difference between the CG and CO methods can exceed 25 W m?2 over marine stratus and land convection, these regional biases nearly cancel in the global mean. The regional monthly CG shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) flux uncertainty is reduced by 20%, whereas the daily uncertainty is reduced by 50% and 20%, respectively, over the CO method, based on comparisons with 15-min Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) data.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleGeostationary Enhanced Temporal Interpolation for CERES Flux Products
typeJournal Paper
journal volume30
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00136.1
journal fristpage1072
journal lastpage1090
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2013:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record