Show simple item record

contributor authorSourdeval, Odran
contributor authorBrogniez, Gérard
contributor authorPelon, Jacques
contributor authorC.-Labonnote, Laurent
contributor authorDubuisson, Philippe
contributor authorParol, Frédéric
contributor authorJosset, Damien
contributor authorGarnier, Anne
contributor authorFaivre, Michaël
contributor authorMinikin, Andreas
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:24:14Z
date available2017-06-09T17:24:14Z
date copyright2012/05/01
date issued2012
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-84618.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227974
description abstractn the frame of validation of the spatial observations from the radiometer IIR on board CALIPSO, the two airborne campaigns Cirrus Cloud Experiment (CIRCLE)-2 and Biscay ?08 took place in 2007 and 2008 in the western part of France, over the Atlantic Ocean. During these experiments, remote sensing measurements were made over cirrus clouds, right under the track of Cloud?Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) in space and time collocation. For this purpose, a Falcon-20 aircraft was equipped with the Lidar pour l?Etude des Interactions Aérosols Nuages Dynamique Rayonnement et du Cycle de l?Eau (LEANDRE)-New Generation (NG) and the thermal infrared radiometer Conveyable Low-Noise Infrared Radiometer for Measurements of Atmosphere and Ground Surface Targets (CLIMAT)-Airborne Version (AV), whose spectral characteristics are strongly similar to those of the infrared imaging radiometer (IIR). In situ measurements were also taken in cirrus clouds during CIRCLE-2. After comparisons, consistent agreements are found between brightness temperatures measured by CLIMAT-AV and IIR. However, deviations in the brightness temperature measurements are still observed, mainly in the 8.6-?m channels. Simulations using a radiative transfer code are performed along a perfectly clear-sky area to show that these dissimilarities are inherent in slight differences between the spectral channels of both radiometers, and in differences between their altitudes. Cloudy and imperfectly clear areas are found to be harder to interpret, but the measurements are still coherent by taking into account experimental uncertainties. In the end, IIR measurements can be validated unambiguously.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleValidation of IIR/CALIPSO Level 1 Measurements by Comparison with Collocated Airborne Observations during CIRCLE-2 and Biscay ‘08 Campaigns
typeJournal Paper
journal volume29
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00143.1
journal fristpage653
journal lastpage667
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2012:;volume( 029 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record