Show simple item record

contributor authorBoodoo, Sudesh
contributor authorHudak, David
contributor authorRyzhkov, Alexander
contributor authorZhang, Pengfei
contributor authorDonaldson, Norman
contributor authorSills, David
contributor authorReid, Janti
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:16:26Z
date available2017-06-09T17:16:26Z
date copyright2015/10/01
date issued2015
identifier issn1525-755X
identifier otherams-82219.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4225309
description abstractheavy rainfall event over a 2-h period on 8 July 2013 caused significant flash flooding in the city of Toronto and produced 126 mm of rain accumulation at a gauge located near the Toronto Pearson International Airport. This paper evaluates the quantitative precipitation estimates from the nearby King City C-band dual-polarized radar (WKR). Horizontal reflectivity Z and differential reflectivity ZDR were corrected for attenuation using a modified ZPHI rain profiling algorithm, and rain rates R were calculated from R(Z) and R(Z, ZDR) algorithms. Specific differential phase KDP was used to compute rain rates from three R(KDP) algorithms, one modified to use positive and negative KDP, and an R(KDP, ZDR) algorithm. Additionally, specific attenuation at horizontal polarization A was used to calculate rates from the R(A) algorithm. High-temporal-resolution rain gauge data at 44 locations measured the surface rainfall every 5 min and produced total rainfall accumulations over the affected area. The nearby NEXRAD S-band dual-polarized radar at Buffalo, New York, provided rain-rate and storm accumulation estimates from R(Z) and S-band dual-polarimetric algorithm. These two datasets were used as references to evaluate the C-band estimates. Significant radome attenuation at WKR overshadowed the attenuation correction techniques and resulted in poor rainfall estimates from the R(Z) and R(Z, ZDR) algorithms. Rainfall estimation from the Brandes et al. R(KDP) and R(A) algorithms were superior to the other methods, and the derived storm total accumulation gave biases of 2.1 and ?6.1 mm, respectively, with correlations of 0.94. The C-band estimates from the Brandes et al. R(KDP) and R(A) algorithms were comparable to the NEXRAD S-band estimates.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleQuantitative Precipitation Estimation from a C-Band Dual-Polarized Radar for the 8 July 2013 Flood in Toronto, Canada
typeJournal Paper
journal volume16
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
identifier doi10.1175/JHM-D-15-0003.1
journal fristpage2027
journal lastpage2044
treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2015:;Volume( 016 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record