| description abstract | ecent upgrades to operational radar-rainfall products in terms of quality and resolution call for reexamination of the factors that contribute to the uncertainty of radar-rainfall estimation. Remapping or regridding of radar observations onto Cartesian coordinates is implemented by practitioners when radar estimates are compared against rain gauge observations, in hydrologic applications, or for merging data from different radars. However, assuming perfect radar observations, many of the widely used remapping methodologies do not conserve mass for the rainfall rate field. The most popular remapping approaches used are those based on extracting information from radar bins whose centers fall within a certain distance from the center of the Cartesian grid. This paper develops a mass-conserving method for remapping, which is called ?precise remapping,? which is compared against two other commonly used remapping methods. Results show that the choice of the remapping method can make a substantial difference in grid-averaged rainfall accumulations (up to more than 100%). Differences were quantified using observations from two radars, collected during a field experiment. The interpolation grid resolution was also found to affect interpolated rainfall estimates. Approximate remapping methods tend to be much more sensitive to the interpolation grid resolution than precise remapping. High-resolution radar data such as those from radars with short gate spacing or narrow beams, or the super-resolution Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) sampling format, are significantly more sensitive (by up to 100%) to the remapping method and the interpolation grid resolution than the legacy WSR-88D rainfall data resolution of 1° ? 1 km. | |
