Show simple item record

contributor authorRotstayn, Leon D.
contributor authorPlymin, Emily L.
contributor authorCollier, Mark A.
contributor authorBoucher, Olivier
contributor authorDufresne, Jean-Louis
contributor authorLuo, Jing-Jia
contributor authorvon Salzen, Knut
contributor authorJeffrey, Stephen J.
contributor authorFoujols, Marie-Alice
contributor authorMing, Yi
contributor authorHorowitz, Larry W.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:10:26Z
date available2017-06-09T17:10:26Z
date copyright2014/09/01
date issued2014
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-80557.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223462
description abstracthe effects of declining anthropogenic aerosols in representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) are assessed in four models from phase 5 the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), with a focus on annual, zonal-mean atmospheric temperature structure and zonal winds. For each model, the effect of declining aerosols is diagnosed from the difference between a projection forced by RCP4.5 for 2006?2100 and another that has identical forcing, except that anthropogenic aerosols are fixed at early twenty-first-century levels. The response to declining aerosols is interpreted in terms of the meridional structure of aerosol radiative forcing, which peaks near 40°N and vanishes at the South Pole.Increasing greenhouse gases cause amplified warming in the tropical upper troposphere and strengthening midlatitude jets in both hemispheres. However, for declining aerosols the vertically averaged tropospheric temperature response peaks near 40°N, rather than in the tropics. This implies that for declining aerosols the tropospheric meridional temperature gradient generally increases in the Southern Hemisphere (SH), but in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) it decreases in the tropics and subtropics. Consistent with thermal wind balance, the NH jet then strengthens on its poleward side and weakens on its equatorward side, whereas the SH jet strengthens more than the NH jet. The asymmetric response of the jets is thus consistent with the meridional structure of aerosol radiative forcing and the associated tropospheric warming: in the NH the latitude of maximum warming is roughly collocated with the jet, whereas in the SH warming is strongest in the tropics and weakest at high latitudes.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleDeclining Aerosols in CMIP5 Projections: Effects on Atmospheric Temperature Structure and Midlatitude Jets
typeJournal Paper
journal volume27
journal issue18
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00258.1
journal fristpage6960
journal lastpage6977
treeJournal of Climate:;2014:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 018
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record