Show simple item record

contributor authorPark, Sungsu
contributor authorBretherton, Christopher S.
contributor authorRasch, Philip J.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:10:03Z
date available2017-06-09T17:10:03Z
date copyright2014/09/01
date issued2014
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-80446.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4223339
description abstracthis paper provides a description of the integrated representation for the cloud processes in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5). CAM5 cloud parameterizations add the following unique characteristics to previous versions: 1) a cloud macrophysical structure with horizontally nonoverlapped deep cumulus, shallow cumulus, and stratus in each grid layer, where each of which has its own cloud fraction, and mass and number concentrations for cloud liquid droplets and ice crystals; 2) stratus?radiation?turbulence interactions that allow CAM5 to simulate marine stratocumulus solely from grid-mean relative humidity without relying on a stability-based empirical formula; 3) prognostic treatment of the number concentrations of stratus liquid droplets and ice crystals, with activated aerosols and detrained in-cumulus condensates as the main sources and with evaporation, sedimentation, and precipitation of stratus condensate as the main sinks; and 4) radiatively active cumulus and snow. By imposing consistency between diagnosed stratus fraction and prognosed stratus condensate, unrealistically empty or highly dense stratus is avoided in CAM5. Because of the activation of the prognostic aerosols and the parameterizations of the radiation and stratiform precipitation production as a function of the cloud droplet size, CAM5 simulates various aerosol indirect effects as well as the direct effects: that is, aerosols affect both the radiation budget and the hydrological cycle.Detailed analysis of various simulations indicates that CAM5 improves upon CAM3/CAM4 in global performance as well as in physical formulation. However, several problems are also identified in CAM5, which can be attributed to deficient regional tuning, inconsistency between various physics parameterizations, and incomplete treatment of physics. Efforts are continuing to further improve CAM5.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleIntegrating Cloud Processes in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 5
typeJournal Paper
journal volume27
journal issue18
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00087.1
journal fristpage6821
journal lastpage6856
treeJournal of Climate:;2014:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 018
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record