| contributor author | Boé, Julien | |
| contributor author | Hall, Alex | |
| contributor author | Qu, Xin | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T17:07:48Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T17:07:48Z | |
| date copyright | 2013/10/01 | |
| date issued | 2013 | |
| identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
| identifier other | ams-79826.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222649 | |
| description abstract | ithan and Mauritsen argue that the 2009 results of Boé et al. are not consistent with current understanding of the lapse-rate feedback in the Arctic. They also argue that these results arise to an important extent from self-correlation issues. In this response, the authors argue that their results are not inconsistent with current understanding of lapse-rate feedback and demonstrate that the conclusions remain unchanged when all possibilities of self-correlation are excluded. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Reply to “Comments on ‘Current GCMs' Unrealistic Negative Feedback in the Arctic'” | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 26 | |
| journal issue | 19 | |
| journal title | Journal of Climate | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00723.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 7789 | |
| journal lastpage | 7792 | |
| tree | Journal of Climate:;2013:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 019 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
