Show simple item record

contributor authorFriedlingstein, Pierre
contributor authorMeinshausen, Malte
contributor authorArora, Vivek K.
contributor authorJones, Chris D.
contributor authorAnav, Alessandro
contributor authorLiddicoat, Spencer K.
contributor authorKnutti, Reto
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:07:26Z
date available2017-06-09T17:07:26Z
date copyright2014/01/01
date issued2013
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-79735.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222548
description abstractn the context of phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, most climate simulations use prescribed atmospheric CO2 concentration and therefore do not interactively include the effect of carbon cycle feedbacks. However, the representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) scenario has additionally been run by earth system models with prescribed CO2 emissions. This paper analyzes the climate projections of 11 earth system models (ESMs) that performed both emission-driven and concentration-driven RCP8.5 simulations. When forced by RCP8.5 CO2 emissions, models simulate a large spread in atmospheric CO2; the simulated 2100 concentrations range between 795 and 1145 ppm. Seven out of the 11 ESMs simulate a larger CO2 (on average by 44 ppm, 985 ± 97 ppm by 2100) and hence higher radiative forcing (by 0.25 W m?2) when driven by CO2 emissions than for the concentration-driven scenarios (941 ppm). However, most of these models already overestimate the present-day CO2, with the present-day biases reasonably well correlated with future atmospheric concentrations? departure from the prescribed concentration. The uncertainty in CO2 projections is mainly attributable to uncertainties in the response of the land carbon cycle. As a result of simulated higher CO2 concentrations than in the concentration-driven simulations, temperature projections are generally higher when ESMs are driven with CO2 emissions. Global surface temperature change by 2100 (relative to present day) increased by 3.9° ± 0.9°C for the emission-driven simulations compared to 3.7° ± 0.7°C in the concentration-driven simulations. Although the lower ends are comparable in both sets of simulations, the highest climate projections are significantly warmer in the emission-driven simulations because of stronger carbon cycle feedbacks.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleUncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks
typeJournal Paper
journal volume27
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00579.1
journal fristpage511
journal lastpage526
treeJournal of Climate:;2013:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record