Show simple item record

contributor authorRutherford, Scott D.
contributor authorMann, Michael E.
contributor authorWahl, Eugene
contributor authorAmmann, Caspar
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:06:02Z
date available2017-06-09T17:06:02Z
date copyright2013/05/01
date issued2013
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-79381.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222154
description abstractmerdon et al. report two errors in the climate model grid data used in previous pseudoproxy-based climate reconstruction experiments that do not impact the main conclusions of those works. The errors did not occur in subsequent works and therefore have no impact on the results presented therein. Results presented here for the Climate System Model (CSM) using multiple pseudoproxy noise realizations show that the quantitative differences between the incorrect and corrected results are within the expected variability of the noise realizations. It should also be made clear that the climate reconstruction method used in Smerdon et al. to illustrate the nature of the errors, the Regularized Expectation Maximization method with Ridge Regression (RegEM-Ridge), is known to produce climate reconstructions with considerable variance loss and has been superseded by RegEM-TTLS (TTLS indicates truncated total least squares).
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComments on “Erroneous Model Field Representations in Multiple Pseudoproxy Studies: Corrections and Implications”
typeJournal Paper
journal volume26
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00065.1
journal fristpage3482
journal lastpage3484
treeJournal of Climate:;2013:;volume( 026 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record