Show simple item record

contributor authorLiu, Zhengyu
contributor authorFan, Lei
contributor authorShin, Sang-Ik
contributor authorLiu, Qinyu
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:05:34Z
date available2017-06-09T17:05:34Z
date copyright2012/10/01
date issued2012
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-79256.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4222016
description abstracthe authors compared the assessment of the seasonal cycle of the atmospheric response to surface forcing in three statistical methods, generalized equilibrium feedback analysis (GEFA), linear inverse modeling (LIM), and fluctuation?dissipation theorem (FDT). These methods are applied to both a conceptual climate model and the observation. It is found that LIM and GEFA are able to reproduce the major features of the seasonal response consistently, whereas FDT tends to generate a bias of the phase of the seasonal cycle. The success of LIM and GEFA for the assessment of the seasonal response is due to the slowly varying nature of the annual cycle relative to the atmospheric response time. Therefore, the authors recommend GEFA and LIM as two independent methods for the assessment of the seasonal atmospheric response in the observation.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleAssessing Atmospheric Response to Surface Forcing in the Observations. Part II: Cross Validation of Seasonal Response Using GEFA and LIM
typeJournal Paper
journal volume25
journal issue19
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00630.1
journal fristpage6817
journal lastpage6834
treeJournal of Climate:;2012:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 019
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record