Show simple item record

contributor authorStowasser, Markus
contributor authorHamilton, Kevin
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:02:22Z
date available2017-06-09T17:02:22Z
date copyright2006/09/01
date issued2006
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-78341.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4220999
description abstractThe relations between local monthly mean shortwave cloud radiative forcing and aspects of the resolved-scale meteorological fields are investigated in hindcast simulations performed with 12 of the global coupled models included in the model intercomparison conducted as part of the preparation for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). In particular, the connection of the cloud forcing over tropical and subtropical ocean areas with resolved midtropospheric vertical velocity and with lower-level relative humidity are investigated and compared among the models. The model results are also compared with observational determinations of the same relationships using satellite data for the cloud forcing and global reanalysis products for the vertical velocity and humidity fields. In the analysis the geographical variability in the long-term mean among all grid points and the interannual variability of the monthly mean at each grid point are considered separately. The shortwave cloud radiative feedback (SWCRF) plays a crucial role in determining the predicted response to large-scale climate forcing (such as from increased greenhouse gas concentrations), and it is thus important to test how the cloud representations in current climate models respond to unforced variability. Overall there is considerable variation among the results for the various models, and all models show some substantial differences from the comparable observed results. The most notable deficiency is a weak representation of the cloud radiative response to variations in vertical velocity in cases of strong ascending or strong descending motions. While the models generally perform better in regimes with only modest upward or downward motions, even in these regimes there is considerable variation among the models in the dependence of SWCRF on vertical velocity. The largest differences between models and observations when SWCRF values are stratified by relative humidity are found in either very moist or very dry regimes. Thus, the largest errors in the model simulations of cloud forcing are prone to be in the western Pacific warm pool area, which is characterized by very moist strong upward currents, and in the rather dry regions where the flow is dominated by descending mean motions.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleRelationship between Shortwave Cloud Radiative Forcing and Local Meteorological Variables Compared in Observations and Several Global Climate Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume19
journal issue17
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI3875.1
journal fristpage4344
journal lastpage4359
treeJournal of Climate:;2006:;volume( 019 ):;issue: 017
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record