Show simple item record

contributor authorSingarayer, J. S.
contributor authorValdes, P. J.
contributor authorBamber, J. L.
date accessioned2017-06-09T17:00:56Z
date available2017-06-09T17:00:56Z
date copyright2005/10/01
date issued2005
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-77966.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4220582
description abstractThere are significant discrepancies between observational datasets of Arctic sea ice concentrations covering the last three decades, which result in differences of over 20% in Arctic summer sea ice extent/area and 5%?10% in winter. Previous modeling studies have shown that idealized sea ice anomalies have the potential for making a substantial impact on climate. In this paper, this theory is further developed by performing a set of simulations using the third Hadley Centre Coupled Atmospheric Model (HadAM3). The model was driven with monthly climatologies of sea ice fractions derived from three of these records to investigate potential implications of sea ice inaccuracies for climate simulations. The standard sea ice climatology from the Met Office provided a control. This study focuses on the effects of actual inaccuracies of concentration retrievals, which vary spatially and are larger in summer than winter. The smaller sea ice discrepancies in winter have a much larger influence on climate than the much greater summer sea ice differences. High sensitivity to sea ice prescription was observed, even though no SST feedbacks were included. Significant effects on surface fields were observed in the Arctic, North Atlantic, and North Pacific. Arctic average surface air temperature anomalies in winter vary by 2.5°C, and locally exceed 12°C. Arctic mean sea level pressure varies by up to 5 mb locally. Anomalies extend to 45°N over North America and Eurasia but not to lower latitudes, and with limited changes in circulation above the boundary layer. No statistically significant impact on climate variability was simulated, in terms of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Results suggest that the uncertainty in summer sea ice prescription is not critical but that winter values require greater accuracy, with the caveats that the influences of ocean?sea ice feedbacks were not included in this study.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Atmospheric Impact of Uncertainties in Recent Arctic Sea Ice Reconstructions
typeJournal Paper
journal volume18
journal issue19
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/JCLI3490.1
journal fristpage3996
journal lastpage4012
treeJournal of Climate:;2005:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 019
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record