Show simple item record

contributor authorTerwey, Wesley
contributor authorAbarca, Sergio F.
contributor authorMontgomery, Michael T.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:55:56Z
date available2017-06-09T16:55:56Z
date copyright2013/03/01
date issued2012
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-76639.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4219108
description abstractn a previous paper Judt and Chen propose that secondary eyewall formation can be the result of the accumulation of convectively generated potential vorticity in the rainbands. They argue that secondary potential vorticity maxima precede the development of the secondary wind maximum and conclude that vortex Rossby waves do not contribute to the formation of the secondary eyewall. Amidst examination of their thought-provoking study, some questions arose regarding their methodology, interpretation, and portrayal of previous literature.Here the authors inquire about aspects of the methodology for diagnosing vortex Rossby waves and assessing their impact on their simulation. Inaccuracies in the literature review are noted and further analysis of existing, three-dimensional, full-physics, numerical hurricane integrations that exhibit canonical secondary eyewalls are encouraged.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComments on “Convectively Generated Potential Vorticity in Rainbands and Formation of the Secondary Eyewall in Hurricane Rita of 2005”
typeJournal Paper
journal volume70
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-12-030.1
journal fristpage984
journal lastpage988
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2012:;Volume( 070 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record