Show simple item record

contributor authorGermann, Urs
contributor authorZawadzki, Isztar
contributor authorTurner, Barry
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:53:02Z
date available2017-06-09T16:53:02Z
date copyright2006/08/01
date issued2006
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-75921.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4218310
description abstractPredictability of precipitation is examined from storm to synoptic scales through an experimental approach using continent-scale radar composite images. The lifetime of radar reflectivity patterns in Eulerian and Lagrangian coordinates is taken as a measure of predictability. The results are stratified according to scale, location, and time in order to determine how predictability depends on these parameters. Three companion papers give a detailed description of the methodology, and present results are obtained for 143 hours of North American warm season rainfall with emphasis on lifetime, scale dependence, optimum smoothing of forecast fields, and predictability in terms of probabilistic rainfall rates. This paper discusses the sources of forecast uncertainty and extends the analysis to a total of 1424 hours of rainfall. In a Lagrangian persistence framework the predictability problem can be separated into a component associated with growth of precipitation and a component associated with changes in the storm motion field. The role of changes in the motion field turned out to be small but not negligible. A stratification of lifetime according to location reveals the regions with high predictability and significant nonstationary storm motion. This work is of high practical significance for three reasons: First, Lagrangian persistence of radar patterns was proved to have skill for probabilistic precipitation nowcasting. The discussion of the sources of uncertainty provides a guideline for further improvements. Second, a scale- and location-dependent benchmark is obtained against which the progress of other precipitation forecasting techniques can be evaluated. And, third, the experimental approach to predictability presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the fundamental question of predictability of precipitation.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titlePredictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part IV: Limits to Prediction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume63
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/JAS3735.1
journal fristpage2092
journal lastpage2108
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2006:;Volume( 063 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record