Show simple item record

contributor authorHourdin, Frédéric
contributor authorMauritsen, Thorsten
contributor authorGettelman, Andrew
contributor authorGolaz, Jean-Christophe
contributor authorBalaji, Venkatramani
contributor authorDuan, Qingyun
contributor authorFolini, Doris
contributor authorJi, Duoying
contributor authorKlocke, Daniel
contributor authorQian, Yun
contributor authorRauser, Florian
contributor authorRio, Catherine
contributor authorTomassini, Lorenzo
contributor authorWatanabe, Masahiro
contributor authorWilliamson, Daniel
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:46:04Z
date available2017-06-09T16:46:04Z
date copyright2017/03/01
date issued2016
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-73730.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4215876
description abstracthe process of parameter estimation targeting a chosen set of observations is an essential aspect of numerical modeling. This process is usually named tuning in the climate modeling community. In climate models, the variety and complexity of physical processes involved, and their interplay through a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, must be summarized in a series of approximate submodels. Most submodels depend on uncertain parameters. Tuning consists of adjusting the values of these parameters to bring the solution as a whole into line with aspects of the observed climate. Tuning is an essential aspect of climate modeling with its own scientific issues, which is probably not advertised enough outside the community of model developers. Optimization of climate models raises important questions about whether tuning methods a priori constrain the model results in unintended ways that would affect our confidence in climate projections. Here, we present the definition and rationale behind model tuning, review specific methodological aspects, and survey the diversity of tuning approaches used in current climate models. We also discuss the challenges and opportunities in applying so-called objective methods in climate model tuning. We discuss how tuning methodologies may affect fundamental results of climate models, such as climate sensitivity. The article concludes with a series of recommendations to make the process of climate model tuning more transparent.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning
typeJournal Paper
journal volume98
journal issue3
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1
journal fristpage589
journal lastpage602
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2016:;volume( 098 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record