Show simple item record

contributor authorCheng, Lijing
contributor authorAbraham, John
contributor authorGoni, Gustavo
contributor authorBoyer, Timothy
contributor authorWijffels, Susan
contributor authorCowley, Rebecca
contributor authorGouretski, Viktor
contributor authorReseghetti, Franco
contributor authorKizu, Shoichi
contributor authorDong, Shenfu
contributor authorBringas, Francis
contributor authorGoes, Marlos
contributor authorHoupert, Loïc
contributor authorSprintall, Janet
contributor authorZhu, Jiang
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:45:51Z
date available2017-06-09T16:45:51Z
date copyright2016/06/01
date issued2015
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-73671.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4215810
description abstractxpendable bathythermograph (XBT) data were the major component of the ocean temperature profile observations from the late 1960s through the early 2000s, and XBTs still continue to provide critical data to monitor surface and subsurface currents, meridional heat transport, and ocean heat content. Systematic errors have been identified in the XBT data, some of which originate from computing the depth in the profile using a theoretically and experimentally derived fall-rate equation (FRE). After in-depth studies of these biases and discussions held in several workshops dedicated to discussing XBT biases, the XBT science community met at the Fourth XBT Science Workshop and concluded that XBT biases consist of 1) errors in depth values due to the inadequacy of the probe motion description done by standard FRE and 2) independent pure temperature biases. The depth error and temperature bias are temperature dependent and may depend on the data acquisition and recording system. In addition, the depth bias also includes an offset term. Some biases affecting the XBT-derived temperature profiles vary with manufacturer/probe type and have been shown to be time dependent. Best practices for historical XBT data corrections, recommendations for future collection of metadata to accompany XBT data, impact of XBT biases on scientific applications, and challenges encountered are presented in this manuscript. Analysis of XBT data shows that, despite the existence of these biases, historical XBT data without bias corrections are still suitable for many scientific applications, and that bias-corrected data can be used for climate research.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleXBT Science: Assessment of Instrumental Biases and Errors
typeJournal Paper
journal volume97
journal issue6
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00031.1
journal fristpage924
journal lastpage933
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2015:;volume( 097 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record