Show simple item record

contributor authorHartten, Leslie M.
contributor authorLeMone, Margaret A.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:44:56Z
date available2017-06-09T16:44:56Z
date copyright2014/05/01
date issued2013
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-73411.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4215522
description abstracts regarding the fractional participation of women in meteorology/atmospheric sciences gathered by the AMS are quite similar to those based on annual National Science Foundation (NSF) surveys. The absolute numbers in the biennial AMS/UCAR survey of academic departments for the Curricula series ceased being useful by around 2005, when many departments stopped participating fully, but numbers from less-frequent direct AMS membership surveys have been increasing. Despite the limitations of the AMS data, the NSF statistics confirm conclusions from an earlier analysis of AMS data. Both numbers and percentages are required to tell the evolving story of the atmospheric sciences' ?pipeline.? Furthermore, after correction of an error regarding the AMS statistics in our 2010 paper, both NSF and AMS data show the same increase in the proportion of women graduate students in the field over the last four decades, as well as an apparent leveling off at approximately one-third.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleHow Representative are AMS Membership Surveys?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume95
journal issue5
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00058.1
journal fristpage775
journal lastpage779
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2013:;volume( 095 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record