Show simple item record

contributor authorIllingworth, A. J.
contributor authorHogan, R. J.
contributor authorO'Connor, E. J.
contributor authorBouniol, D.
contributor authorDelanoë, J.
contributor authorPelon, J.
contributor authorProtat, A.
contributor authorBrooks, M. E.
contributor authorGaussiat, N.
contributor authorWilson, D. R.
contributor authorDonovan, D. P.
contributor authorBaltink, H. Klein
contributor authorvan Zadelhoff, G-J.
contributor authorEastment, J. D.
contributor authorGoddard, J. W. F.
contributor authorWrench, C. L.
contributor authorHaeffelin, M.
contributor authorKrasnov, O. A.
contributor authorRusschenberg, H. W. J.
contributor authorPiriou, J-M.
contributor authorVinit, F.
contributor authorSeifert, A.
contributor authorTompkins, A. M.
contributor authorWillén, U.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:43:26Z
date available2017-06-09T16:43:26Z
date copyright2007/06/01
date issued2007
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-73015.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4215083
description abstractThe Cloudnet project aims to provide a systematic evaluation of clouds in forecast and climate models by comparing the model output with continuous ground-based observations of the vertical profiles of cloud properties. In the models, the properties of clouds are simplified and expressed in terms of the fraction of the model grid box, which is filled with cloud, together with the liquid and ice water content of the clouds. These models must get the clouds right if they are to correctly represent both their radiative properties and their key role in the production of precipitation, but there are few observations of the vertical profiles of the cloud properties that show whether or not they are successful. Cloud profiles derived from cloud radars, ceilometers, and dual-frequency microwave radiometers operated at three sites in France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom for several years have been compared with the clouds in seven European models. The advantage of this continuous appraisal is that the feedback on how new versions of models are performing is provided in quasi?real time, as opposed to the much longer time scale needed for in-depth analysis of complex field studies. Here, two occasions are identified when the introduction of new versions of the ECMWF and Météo-France models leads to an immediate improvement in the representation of the clouds and also provides statistics on the performance of the seven models. The Cloudnet analysis scheme is currently being expanded to include sites outside Europe and further operational forecasting and climate models.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleCloudnet
typeJournal Paper
journal volume88
journal issue6
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/BAMS-88-6-883
journal fristpage883
journal lastpage898
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2007:;volume( 088 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record