Show simple item record

contributor authorBröcker, Jochen
contributor authorSiegert, Stefan
contributor authorKantz, Holger
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:41:09Z
date available2017-06-09T16:41:09Z
date copyright2011/10/01
date issued2011
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-72199.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4214175
description abstractn a recent paper, Mason et al. propose a reliability test of ensemble forecasts for a continuous, scalar verification. As noted in the paper, the test relies on a very specific interpretation of ensembles, namely, that the ensemble members represent quantiles of some underlying distribution. This quantile interpretation is not the only interpretation of ensembles, another popular one being the Monte Carlo interpretation. Mason et al. suggest estimating the quantiles in this situation; however, this approach is fundamentally flawed. Errors in the quantile estimates are not independent of the exceedance events, and consequently the conditional exceedance probabilities (CEP) curves are not constant, which is a fundamental assumption of the test. The test would reject reliable forecasts with probability much higher than the test size.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComments on “Conditional Exceedance Probabilities”
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue10
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/2011MWR3658.1
journal fristpage3322
journal lastpage3324
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2011:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record