| description abstract | The life cycle of Tropical Storm Isobel was simulated reasonably well in the Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM), a global cloud-system-resolving model. The evolution of the large-scale circulation and the storm-scale structure change was discussed in Part I. Both the mesoscale and system-scale processes in the life cycle of the simulated Isobel are documented in this paper. In the preconditioned favorable environment over the Java Sea, mesoscale convective vortices (model MCVs) developed in the mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) and convective towers with cyclonic potential vorticity (PV) anomalies throughout the troposphere [model vortical hot towers (VHTs)] appeared in the model MCVs. Multiple model VHTs strengthened cyclonic PV in the interior of the model MCV and led to the formation of an upright monolithic PV core at the center of the concentric MCV (primary vortex enhancement). As the monolithic PV core with a warm core developed near the circulation center, the intensification and the increase in horizontal size of the cyclonic PV were enhanced through the system-scale intensification (SSI) process (the secondary vortex enhancement), leading to the genesis of Isobel over the Timor Sea. The SSI process can be well explained by the balanced dynamics. After its genesis, the subsequent evolution of the simulated Isobel was controlled by both the external influence and the internal dynamics. Under the unfavorable environmental conditions, the development of asymmetric structure reduced the axisymmetric diabatic heating in the inner core and the SSI process became ineffective and the storm weakened. Later on, as the eyewall reformed as a result of the axisymmetrization of an inward-propagating outer spiral rainband, the SSI process became effective again, leading to the reintensification of Isobel. Therefore, the large-scale environmental flow provided the precondition for the genesis of Isobel and the triggering mechanism for subsequent storm-scale structure change as discussed in Part I. The system-scale and mesoscale processes, such as the evolution of MCVs and merging VHTs, were responsible for the genesis, while the eyewall processes were critical to the storm intensity change through the SSI process. | |
