contributor author | Jankov, Isidora | |
contributor author | Grasso, Lewis D. | |
contributor author | Sengupta, Manajit | |
contributor author | Neiman, Paul J. | |
contributor author | Zupanski, Dusanka | |
contributor author | Zupanski, Milija | |
contributor author | Lindsey, Daniel | |
contributor author | Hillger, Donald W. | |
contributor author | Birkenheuer, Daniel L. | |
contributor author | Brummer, Renate | |
contributor author | Yuan, Huiling | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:36:30Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:36:30Z | |
date copyright | 2011/08/01 | |
date issued | 2011 | |
identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
identifier other | ams-70853.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4212680 | |
description abstract | he main purpose of the present study is to assess the value of synthetic satellite imagery as a tool for model evaluation performance in addition to more traditional approaches. For this purpose, synthetic GOES-10 imagery at 10.7 ?m was produced using output from the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW-WRF) numerical model. Use of synthetic imagery is a unique method to indirectly evaluate the performance of various microphysical schemes available within the ARW-WRF. In the present study, a simulation of an atmospheric river event that occurred on 30 December 2005 was used. The simulations were performed using the ARW-WRF numerical model with five different microphysical schemes [Lin, WRF single-moment 6 class (WSM6), Thompson, Schultz, and double-moment Morrison]. Synthetic imagery was created and scenes from the simulations were statistically compared with observations from the 10.7-?m band of the GOES-10 imager using a histogram-based technique. The results suggest that synthetic satellite imagery is useful in model performance evaluations as a complementary metric to those used traditionally. For example, accumulated precipitation analyses and other commonly used fields in model evaluations suggested a good agreement among solutions from various microphysical schemes, while the synthetic imagery analysis pointed toward notable differences in simulations of clouds among the microphysical schemes. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | An Evaluation of Five ARW-WRF Microphysics Schemes Using Synthetic GOES Imagery for an Atmospheric River Event Affecting the California Coast | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 12 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2010JHM1282.1 | |
journal fristpage | 618 | |
journal lastpage | 633 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2011:;Volume( 012 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |