Show simple item record

contributor authorScaife, Adam A.
contributor authorWoollings, Tim
contributor authorKnight, Jeff
contributor authorMartin, Gill
contributor authorHinton, Tim
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:35:56Z
date available2017-06-09T16:35:56Z
date copyright2010/12/01
date issued2010
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-70679.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4212486
description abstractModels often underestimate blocking in the Atlantic and Pacific basins and this can lead to errors in both weather and climate predictions. Horizontal resolution is often cited as the main culprit for blocking errors due to poorly resolved small-scale variability, the upscale effects of which help to maintain blocks. Although these processes are important for blocking, the authors show that much of the blocking error diagnosed using common methods of analysis and current climate models is directly attributable to the climatological bias of the model. This explains a large proportion of diagnosed blocking error in models used in the recent Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change report. Furthermore, greatly improved statistics are obtained by diagnosing blocking using climate model data corrected to account for mean model biases. To the extent that mean biases may be corrected in low-resolution models, this suggests that such models may be able to generate greatly improved levels of atmospheric blocking.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleAtmospheric Blocking and Mean Biases in Climate Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume23
journal issue23
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/2010JCLI3728.1
journal fristpage6143
journal lastpage6152
treeJournal of Climate:;2010:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 023
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record