Show simple item record

contributor authorReynolds, Richard W.
contributor authorChelton, Dudley B.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:35:00Z
date available2017-06-09T16:35:00Z
date copyright2010/07/01
date issued2010
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-70426.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4212206
description abstractSix different SST analyses are compared with each other and with buoy data for the period 2007?08. All analyses used different combinations of satellite data [for example, infrared Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) and microwave Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) instruments] with different algorithms, spatial resolution, etc. The analyses considered are the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) AVHRR-only and AMSR+AVHRR, the Navy Coupled Ocean Data Assimilation (NCODA), the Remote Sensing Systems (RSS), the Real-Time Global High-Resolution (RTG-HR), and the Operational SST and Sea Ice Analysis (OSTIA); the spatial grid sizes were , respectively. In addition, all analyses except RSS used in situ data. Most analysis procedures and weighting functions differed. Thus, differences among analyses could be large in high-gradient and data-sparse regions. An example off the coast of South Carolina showed winter SST differences that exceeded 5°C. To help quantify SST analysis differences, wavenumber spectra were computed at several locations. These results suggested that the RSS is much noisier and that the RTG-HR analysis is much smoother than the other analyses. Further comparisons made using collocated buoys showed that RSS was especially noisy in the tropics and that RTG-HR had winter biases near the Aleutians region during January and February 2007. The correlation results show that NCODA and, to a somewhat lesser extent, OSTIA are strongly tuned locally to buoy data. The results also show that grid spacing does not always correlate with analysis resolution. The AVHRR-only analysis is useful for climate studies because it is the only daily SST analysis that extends back to September 1981. Furthermore, comparisons of the AVHRR-only analysis and the AMSR+AVHRR analysis show that AMSR data can degrade the combined AMSR and AVHRR resolution in cloud-free regions while AMSR otherwise improves the resolution. These results indicate that changes in satellite instruments over time can impact SST analysis resolution.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComparisons of Daily Sea Surface Temperature Analyses for 2007–08
typeJournal Paper
journal volume23
journal issue13
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/2010JCLI3294.1
journal fristpage3545
journal lastpage3562
treeJournal of Climate:;2010:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 013
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record