Show simple item record

contributor authorSolomon, Amy
contributor authorMorrison, Hugh
contributor authorPersson, Ola
contributor authorShupe, Matthew D.
contributor authorBao, Jian-Wen
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:31:41Z
date available2017-06-09T16:31:41Z
date copyright2009/09/01
date issued2009
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-69451.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211121
description abstractIn this study the Weather Research Forecast model is used with 1-km horizontal grid spacing to investigate the microphysical properties of Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus. Intensive measurements taken during the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) on the North Slope of Alaska, during 9?12 October 2004, are used to verify the microphysical characteristics of the model?s simulation of mixed-phase clouds (MPCs). A series of one- and two-moment bulk microphysical cloud schemes are tested to identify how the treatment of snow and ice affects the maintenance of cloud liquid water at low temperatures. The baseline two-moment simulation results in realistic liquid water paths and in size distributions of snow reasonably similar to observations. With a one-moment simulation for which the size distribution intercept parameter for snow is fixed at values taken from the two-moment simulation, reasonable snow size distributions are again obtained but the cloud liquid water is reduced because the one-moment scheme couples the number concentration to the mixing ratio. The one-moment scheme with the constant snow intercept parameter set to a value typical of midlatitude frontal clouds results in a substantial underprediction of the liquid water path. In the simulations, the number concentration of small ice crystals is found to be underestimated by an order of magnitude. A sensitivity test with the concentration of ice particles larger than 53 ?m increased to the observed value results in underprediction of the liquid water path. If ice (not snow) is the primary driver for the depletion of cloud liquid water, then the results of this study suggest that the feedbacks among ice?snow?cloud liquid water may be misrepresented in the model.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleInvestigation of Microphysical Parameterizations of Snow and Ice in Arctic Clouds during M-PACE through Model–Observation Comparisons
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue9
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/2009MWR2688.1
journal fristpage3110
journal lastpage3128
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2009:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record