Show simple item record

contributor authorBattaglia, Alessandro
contributor authorRustemeier, Elke
contributor authorTokay, Ali
contributor authorBlahak, Ulrich
contributor authorSimmer, Clemens
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:31:24Z
date available2017-06-09T16:31:24Z
date copyright2010/02/01
date issued2010
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-69370.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211031
description abstractThe performance of the laser-optical Particle Size Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometer is evaluated to determine the characteristics of falling snow. PARSIVEL?s measuring principle is reexamined to detect its limitations and pitfalls when applied to solid precipitation. This study uses snow observations taken during the Canadian Cloudsat/Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) Validation Project (C3VP) campaign, when two PARSIVEL instruments were collocated with a single two-dimensional disdrometer (2-DVD), which allows more detailed observation of snowflakes. When characterizing the snowflake size, PARSIVEL instruments inherently retrieve only one size parameter, which is approximately equal to the widest horizontal dimension (more accurately with large snowflakes) and that has no microphysical meaning. Unlike for raindrops, the equivolume PARSIVEL diameter?the PARSIVEL output variable?has no physical counterpart for snowflakes. PARSIVEL?s fall velocity measurement may not be accurate for a single snowflake particle. This is due to the internally assumed relationship between horizontal and vertical snow particle dimensions. The uncertainty originates from the shape-related factor, which tends to depart more and more from unity with increasing snowflake sizes and can produce large errors. When averaging over a large number of snowflakes, the correction factor is size dependent with a systematic tendency to an underestimation of the fall speed (but never exceeding 20%). Compared to a collocated 2-DVD for long-lasting events, PARSIVEL seems to overestimate the number of small snowflakes and large particles. The disagreement between PARSIVEL and 2-DVD snow measurements can only be partly ascribed to PARSIVEL intrinsic limitations (border effects and sizing problems), but it has to deal with the difficulties and drawbacks of both instruments in fully characterizing snow properties.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titlePARSIVEL Snow Observations: A Critical Assessment
typeJournal Paper
journal volume27
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/2009JTECHA1332.1
journal fristpage333
journal lastpage344
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2010:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record