| description abstract | Kinematic and thermodynamic structures of a nonprecipitating cold front observed in west-central Kansas on 10 June 2002 during the International H2O Project (IHOP) are examined with dropsondes and airborne instrumentation that includes Doppler radars, a differential absorption lidar, and in situ sensors. Intensive observations were collected along a 125-km segment of the front, with coverage of both the cold front leading edge and the post- and prefrontal areas. Whereas the first part of this two-part series of papers focused on across-front kinematic and moisture characteristics, the study herein investigates alongfront structures relevant for convection initiation. A northeast?southwest-oriented cold front moved into the observational domain from the northwest, but its motion slowed to less than 1 m s?1 in the early afternoon. In the late afternoon it was intersected by a north-northeast?south-southwest-oriented reflectivity thin line that was advected from the southwest, and another boundary that is an extension of a large-scale dryline paralleling the thin line but located farther to the east. Doppler wind synthesis suggests an increase in low-level horizontal wind shear across the cold front leading edge with the approach and intersection of the boundaries causing an increase in low-level convergence (up to ?1 ? 10?3 s?1), positive vertical vorticity (up to ?0.5 ? 10?3 s?1), and upward motion (up to ?1 m s?1). An organized pattern of misocyclones (vertical vorticity maxima <4 km) and enhanced updrafts with a spacing of ?5?8 km were observed at the cold front leading edge. At the same time vortex lines manifested as horizontal vorticity maxima were observed within the cold air oriented perpendicular to the cold front leading edge and on top of the vertical wind shear layer. The analysis suggests that inflection point instability was the dominant mechanism for their development. Low Richardson number (0.3?0.4), short lifetime (<2 h), horizontal wavelength of 3?6 km, and collocation with strong horizontal and vertical wind shear are characteristics that support the hypothesis that these instabilities were Kelvin?Helmholtz waves. Towering cumulus developed along the cold front forming a convective cell close to the intersection of the cold front, dryline, and reflectivity thin line. | |
