Show simple item record

contributor authorSobel, Adam H.
contributor authorBellon, Gilles
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:23:13Z
date available2017-06-09T16:23:13Z
date copyright2009/07/01
date issued2009
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-66936.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4208327
description abstractThis paper examines the influence of imposed drying, intended to represent horizontal advection of dry air, on parameterized deep convection interacting with large-scale dynamics in a single-column model framework. Two single-column models, one based on the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System general circulation model version 5 (GEOS5) and the other developed by Bony and Emanuel, are run in weak temperature gradient mode. Drying is imposed by relaxation of the specific humidity field toward zero within a specified vertical layer. The strength of the drying is controlled by specifying either the relaxation time scale or the vertically integrated drying tendency; results are insensitive to which specification is used. The two models reach very different solutions for the same boundary conditions and model configuration. Even when adjustments to the boundary conditions and model parameters are made to render the precipitation rates similar, large differences in the profiles of relative humidity and large-scale vertical velocity persist. In both models, however, drying in the middle troposphere is more effective, per kg m?2 s?1 (or W m?2) of imposed drying, in suppressing precipitation than is drying in the lower troposphere. Even when compared at equal relaxation time (corresponding to weaker net drying in the middle than lower troposphere), middle-tropospheric drying is comparably effective to lower-tropospheric drying. Upper-tropospheric drying has a relatively small effect on precipitation, although large drying in the upper troposphere cannot be imposed as a steady state because of the lack of moisture there. Consistent with the other model differences, the gross moist stabilities of the two models are quite different and vary somewhat differently as a function of imposed drying, but in both models the gross moist stability increases as the drying is increased when it is less than around 30 W m?2 and located in the middle troposphere. For lower-tropospheric drying, the gross moist stability either decreases with increased drying or increases more slowly than for middle-tropospheric drying.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Effect of Imposed Drying on Parameterized Deep Convection
typeJournal Paper
journal volume66
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/2008JAS2926.1
journal fristpage2085
journal lastpage2096
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2009:;Volume( 066 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record