Show simple item record

contributor authorDoherty, Sarah J.
contributor authorBojinski, Stephan
contributor authorGoodrich, David
contributor authorHenderson-Sellers, Ann
contributor authorNoone, Kevin
contributor authorBindoff, Nathaniel L.
contributor authorChurch, John A.
contributor authorHibbard, Kathy A.
contributor authorKarl, Thomas R.
contributor authorKajfez-Bogataj, Lucka
contributor authorLynch, Amanda H.
contributor authorParker, David E.
contributor authorThorne, Peter W.
contributor authorPrentice, I. Colin
contributor authorRamaswamy, Venkatachalam
contributor authorSaunders, Roger W.
contributor authorStafford Smith, Mark
contributor authorSteffen, Konrad
contributor authorStocker, Thomas F.
contributor authorTrenberth, Kevin E.
contributor authorVerstraete, Michel M.
contributor authorZwiers, Francis W.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:22:02Z
date available2017-06-09T16:22:02Z
date copyright2009/04/01
date issued2009
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-66553.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207902
description abstractThe Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that global warming is ?unequivocal? and that most of the observed increase since the mid-twentieth century is very likely due to the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations, with discernible human influences on ocean warming, continental-average temperatures, temperature extremes, wind patterns, and other physical and biological indicators, impacting both socioeconomic and ecological systems. It is now clear that we are committed to some level of global climate change, and it is imperative that this be considered when planning future climate research and observational strategies. The Global Climate Observing System program (GCOS), the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP), and the International Geosphere?Biosphere Programme (IGBP) therefore initiated a process to summarize the lessons learned through AR4 Working Groups I and II and to identify a set of high-priority modeling and observational needs. Two classes of recommendations emerged. First is the need to improve climate models, observational and climate monitoring systems, and our understanding of key processes. Second, the framework for climate research and observations must be extended to document impacts and to guide adaptation and mitigation efforts. Research and observational strategies specifically aimed at improving our ability to predict and understand impacts, adaptive capacity, and societal and ecosystem vulnerabilities will serve both purposes and are the subject of the specific recommendations made in this paper.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleLessons Learned from IPCC AR4: Scientific Developments Needed to Understand, Predict, and Respond to Climate Change
typeJournal Paper
journal volume90
journal issue4
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/2008BAMS2643.1
journal fristpage497
journal lastpage513
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2009:;volume( 090 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record