Show simple item record

contributor authorSimmons, Kevin M.
contributor authorSutter, Daniel
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:21:29Z
date available2017-06-09T16:21:29Z
date copyright2008/04/01
date issued2008
identifier issn0882-8156
identifier otherams-66402.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207735
description abstractConventional wisdom holds that improved tornado warnings will reduce tornado casualties, because longer lead times on warnings provide extra opportunities to alert residents who can then take precautions. The relationship between warnings and casualties is examined using a dataset of tornadoes in the contiguous United States between 1986 and 2002. Two questions are examined: Does a warning issued on a tornado reduce the resulting number of fatalities and injuries? Do longer lead times reduce casualties? It is found that warnings have had a significant and consistent effect on tornado injuries, with a reduction of over 40% at some lead time intervals. The results for fatalities are mixed. An increase in lead time up to about 15 min reduces fatalities, while lead times longer than 15 min increase fatalities compared with no warning. The fatality results beyond 15 min, however, depend on five killer tornadoes and consequently are not robust.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleTornado Warnings, Lead Times, and Tornado Casualties: An Empirical Investigation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume23
journal issue2
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/2007WAF2006027.1
journal fristpage246
journal lastpage258
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2008:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record