Show simple item record

contributor authorConzemius, Robert J.
contributor authorFedorovich, Evgeni
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:21:13Z
date available2017-06-09T16:21:13Z
date copyright2008/07/01
date issued2008
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-66328.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207652
description abstractResults are presented from a combined numerical and observational study of the convective boundary layer (CBL) diurnal evolution on a day of the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002) experiment that was marked by the passage of a dryline across part of the Oklahoma and Texas Panhandles. The initial numerical setup was based on observational data obtained from IHOP_2002 measurement platforms and supplementary datasets from surrounding locations. The initial goals of the study were as follows: (i) numerical investigation of the structure and evolution of the relatively shallow and homogeneous CBL east of the dryline by means of large-eddy simulation (LES), (ii) evaluation of LES predictions of the sheared CBL growth against lidar observations of the CBL depth evolution, and (iii) comparison of the simulated turbulence structures with those observed by lidar and vertically pointing radar during the CBL evolution. In the process of meeting these goals, complications associated with comparisons between LES predictions and atmospheric observations of sheared CBLs were encountered, adding an additional purpose to this study, namely, to convey and analyze these issues. For a period during mid- to late morning, the simulated CBL evolution was found to be in fair agreement with atmospheric lidar and radar observations, and the simulated entrainment dynamics were consistent with those from previous studies. However, CBL depths, determined from lidar data, increased at a faster rate than in the simulations during the afternoon, and the wind direction veered in the simulations more than in the observations. The CBL depth discrepancy can be explained by a dryline solenoidal circulation reported in other studies of the 22 May 2002 case. The discrepancy in winds can be explained by time variation of the large-scale pressure gradient, which was not included in LES.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA Case Study of Convective Boundary Layer Development during IHOP_2002: Numerical Simulations Compared to Observations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue7
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/2007MWR2193.1
journal fristpage2305
journal lastpage2320
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2008:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record