Show simple item record

contributor authorRaja, M. K. Rama Varma
contributor authorGutman, Seth I.
contributor authorYoe, James G.
contributor authorMcMillin, Larry M.
contributor authorZhao, Jiang
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:20:32Z
date available2017-06-09T16:20:32Z
date copyright2008/03/01
date issued2008
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-66101.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207399
description abstractA robust and easily implemented verification procedure based on the column-integrated precipitable water (IPW) vapor estimates derived from a network of ground-based global positioning system (GPS) receivers has been used to assess the quality of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) IPW retrievals over the contiguous United States. For a period of six months from April to October 2004, excellent agreement has been realized between GPS-derived IPW estimates and those determined from AIRS, showing small monthly bias values ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 mm and root-mean-square (rms) differences of 4 mm or less. When the spatial (latitude?longitude) window for the GPS and AIRS matchup observations is reduced from the initial ½° by ½° to ¼° by ¼°, the rms differences are reduced. Analysis revealed that the observed IPW biases between the instruments are strongly correlated to the reported surface pressure differences between the GPS and AIRS observational points. Adjusting the AIRS IPW values to account for the surface pressure discrepancies resulted in significant reductions of the bias between GPS and AIRS. A similar reduction can be obtained by comparing only (GPS?AIRS) match-up pairs for which the corresponding surface pressure differences are 0.5 mb or less. The comparisons also revealed that the AIRS IPW tends to be relatively dry in moist atmospheres (when IPW values >40 mm) but wetter in dry cases (when IPW values <10 mm). This is consistent with the documented bias of satellite measurements toward the first guess used in retrieval algorithms. However, additional study is needed to verify whether the AIRS water vapor retrieval process is the source of the discrepancies. It is shown that the IPW bias and rms differences have a seasonal dependency, with a maximum in summer (bias ? 1.2 mm, rms ? 4.14 mm) and minimum in winter (bias < ?0.5 mm, rms ? 3 mm).
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Validation of AIRS Retrievals of Integrated Precipitable Water Vapor Using Measurements from a Network of Ground-Based GPS Receivers over the Contiguous United States
typeJournal Paper
journal volume25
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/2007JTECHA889.1
journal fristpage416
journal lastpage428
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2008:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record