Show simple item record

contributor authorKnutti, R.
contributor authorAllen, M. R.
contributor authorFriedlingstein, P.
contributor authorGregory, J. M.
contributor authorHegerl, G. C.
contributor authorMeehl, G. A.
contributor authorMeinshausen, M.
contributor authorMurphy, J. M.
contributor authorPlattner, G.-K.
contributor authorRaper, S. C. B.
contributor authorStocker, T. F.
contributor authorStott, P. A.
contributor authorTeng, H.
contributor authorWigley, T. M. L.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:19:52Z
date available2017-06-09T16:19:52Z
date copyright2008/06/01
date issued2008
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-65880.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207153
description abstractQuantification of the uncertainties in future climate projections is crucial for the implementation of climate policies. Here a review of projections of global temperature change over the twenty-first century is provided for the six illustrative emission scenarios from the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) that assume no policy intervention, based on the latest generation of coupled general circulation models, climate models of intermediate complexity, and simple models, and uncertainty ranges and probabilistic projections from various published methods and models are assessed. Despite substantial improvements in climate models, projections for given scenarios on average have not changed much in recent years. Recent progress has, however, increased the confidence in uncertainty estimates and now allows a better separation of the uncertainties introduced by scenarios, physical feedbacks, carbon cycle, and structural uncertainty. Projection uncertainties are now constrained by observations and therefore consistent with past observed trends and patterns. Future trends in global temperature resulting from anthropogenic forcing over the next few decades are found to be comparably well constrained. Uncertainties for projections on the century time scale, when accounting for structural and feedback uncertainties, are larger than captured in single models or methods. This is due to differences in the models, the sources of uncertainty taken into account, the type of observational constraints used, and the statistical assumptions made. It is shown that as an approximation, the relative uncertainty range for projected warming in 2100 is the same for all scenarios. Inclusion of uncertainties in carbon cycle?climate feedbacks extends the upper bound of the uncertainty range by more than the lower bound.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA Review of Uncertainties in Global Temperature Projections over the Twenty-First Century
typeJournal Paper
journal volume21
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/2007JCLI2119.1
journal fristpage2651
journal lastpage2663
treeJournal of Climate:;2008:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record