Show simple item record

contributor authorAnderson, Christopher J.
contributor authorArritt, Raymond W.
contributor authorPan, Zaitao
contributor authorTakle, Eugene S.
contributor authorGutowski, William J.
contributor authorOtieno, Francis O.
contributor authorda Silva, Renato
contributor authorCaya, Daniel
contributor authorChristensen, Jens H.
contributor authorLüthi, Daniel
contributor authorGaertner, Miguel A.
contributor authorGallardo, Clemente
contributor authorGiorgi, Filippo
contributor authorLaprise, René
contributor authorHong, Song-You
contributor authorJones, Colin
contributor authorJuang, H-M. H.
contributor authorKatzfey, J. J.
contributor authorMcGregor, John L.
contributor authorLapenta, William M.
contributor authorLarson, Jay W.
contributor authorTaylor, John A.
contributor authorListon, Glen E.
contributor authorPielke, Roger A.
contributor authorRoads, John O.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:17:23Z
date available2017-06-09T16:17:23Z
date copyright2003/06/01
date issued2003
identifier issn1525-755X
identifier otherams-65080.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206265
description abstractThirteen regional climate model (RCM) simulations of June?July 1993 were compared with each other and observations. Water vapor conservation and precipitation characteristics in each RCM were examined for a 10° ? 10° subregion of the upper Mississippi River basin, containing the region of maximum 60-day accumulated precipitation in all RCMs and station reports. All RCMs produced positive precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P ? E > 0), though most RCMs produced P ? E below the observed range. RCM recycling ratios were within the range estimated from observations. No evidence of common errors of E was found. In contrast, common dry bias of P was found in the simulations. Daily cycles of terms in the water vapor conservation equation were qualitatively similar in most RCMs. Nocturnal maximums of P and C (convergence) occurred in 9 of 13 RCMs, consistent with observations. Three of the four driest simulations failed to couple P and C overnight, producing afternoon maximum P. Further, dry simulations tended to produce a larger fraction of their 60-day accumulated precipitation from low 3-h totals. In station reports, accumulation from high (low) 3-h totals had a nocturnal (early morning) maximum. This time lag occurred, in part, because many mesoscale convective systems had reached peak intensity overnight and had declined in intensity by early morning. None of the RCMs contained such a time lag. It is recommended that short-period experiments be performed to examine the ability of RCMs to simulate mesoscale convective systems prior to generating long-period simulations for hydroclimatology.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleHydrological Processes in Regional Climate Model Simulations of the Central United States Flood of June–July 1993
typeJournal Paper
journal volume4
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
identifier doi10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<0584:HPIRCM>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage584
journal lastpage598
treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2003:;Volume( 004 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record