Show simple item record

contributor authorZou, Cheng-Zhi
contributor authorVan Woert, Michael L.
contributor authorXu, Chuanyu
contributor authorSyed, Kamran
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:15:41Z
date available2017-06-09T16:15:41Z
date copyright2004/10/01
date issued2004
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-64354.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4205459
description abstractMoisture fields from the NCEP?DOE reanalysis-2 (R-2) and Television Infrared Observational Satellite (TIROS) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) Pathfinder A are validated using the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) retrievals over the Southern Ocean. It is shown that the spatial distributions of the annual mean statistics of the total precipitable water are similar among SSM/I, R-2, and TOVS Pathfinder A for both the eddy and mean components. However, transient statistics show that the R-2 total precipitable water agrees with SSM/I with a correlation of 0.77 over the Southern Ocean while the TOVS Pathfinder A moisture is almost uncorrelated with the SSM/I data. Total moisture transport convergence for 1988 over the Antarctic continent is further examined using the R-2 wind and moisture data as well as the moisture retrievals from TOVS Pathfinder A. To gain a better understanding of transient and mean processes on moisture transport, the total moisture transport was decomposed into mean and eddy components. The results suggest that a mass conservation correction is necessary for the mean component, but can safely be ignored for the eddy component. With the mass conservation correction, the mean moisture transport is about the same for both the R-2 estimate alone and the estimate based on the mixed TOVS Pathfinder A moisture?R-2 wind. The computed eddy and total moisture transport convergence over Antarctica for the R-2 data agrees within 10%?15% with previous surface-data-based estimates as well as estimates from other model analyses. However, the eddy component of the mixed TOVS moisture with R-2 wind is about 60%?70% lower than the R-2 result. These differences occur because the eddy moisture amplitude of the TOVS Pathfinder A is nearly 40% lower than the R-2 data and also because the TOVS moisture has a much lower correlation with the R-2 winds. These results reflect the difficulties with the TOVS sensor in quantifying synoptic moisture transients resulting from conditional sampling problems.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleAssessment of the NCEP–DOE Reanalysis-2 and TOVS Pathfinder A Moisture Fields and Their Use in Antarctic Net Precipitation Estimates
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue10
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2463:AOTNRA>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage2463
journal lastpage2476
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2004:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record