Show simple item record

contributor authorChu, Peter C.
contributor authorChen, Xiong-Shan
contributor authorFan, Chenwu
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:13:29Z
date available2017-06-09T16:13:29Z
date copyright2001/01/01
date issued2001
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-63666.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4204694
description abstractCommonly used horizontal diffusion and wavenumber truncation dealiasing methods in spectral models are verified using the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 3. For the same horizontal grid resolution, time step, physical processes, boundary conditions, and initial conditions, the simulated climate, using the horizontal diffusion alone model, is better than that using the wavenumber truncation method. In comparison with the observed climate data, the global root-mean-square of simulated January monthly mean 500-hPa geopotential using the horizontal diffusion alone model is 25% less than that using the wavenumber truncation model. However, for the same spectral resolution, the wavenumber truncation model (high horizontal grid resolution) leads to more accurate solutions than the horizontal diffusion model (low horizontal grid resolution).
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComparison between Wavenumber Truncation and Horizontal Diffusion Methods in Spectral Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume129
journal issue1
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0152:CBWTAH>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage152
journal lastpage158
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2001:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record