Show simple item record

contributor authorLambert, Steven J.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:07:19Z
date available2017-06-09T16:07:19Z
date copyright1989/05/01
date issued1989
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-61418.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4202197
description abstractA comparison is made of the divergent wind analyses of the National Meteorological Center (NMC) and those of the ECMWF/WMO dataset produced by the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Using a reliability criterion based on the degree of correlation between month-long time series of daily values, the utility of the analyses is assessed over the globe on seven pressure levels from 100 to 1000 mb for all Januarys and Julys between 1980 and 1986. The results indicate that from January 1983 onward, the analyses for the winter hemisphere midlatitudes (≈20°?70°) and for the summer hemisphere midlatitudes (≈35°?70°) should be considered reliable except in midtropospheric levels where the divergence is weak. The tropical (between about 20° latitude of the winter hemisphere and 35° latitude of the summer hemisphere) analyses are especially poor and fall far short of satisfying the reliability criterion.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA Comparison of Divergent Winds from the National Meteorological Center and the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts Global Analyses for 1980–1986
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue5
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0995:ACODWF>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage995
journal lastpage1005
treeMonthly Weather Review:;1989:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record