| contributor author | Eugene A. Miller | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:11:12Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:11:12Z | |
| date copyright | November 1996 | |
| date issued | 1996 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290742-597x%281996%2912%3A6%2840%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/41960 | |
| description abstract | Litigation in the construction industry usually involves opinions about the “standard of care.” This paper discusses the problems with individual opinions, and describes three basic methods for determining a “standard of care”: (1) informal interviews; (2) formal interviews; and (3) work product audits. Methodology is discussed and examples of a questionnaire and checklists are presented. The results of some case histories and a correlative study lead to the writer's conclusion that a carefully conducted work product audit is the most reliable measure of the “standard of care.” An additional conclusion is that the “standard of care” is not sharply defined but encompasses a range of acceptable practices. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | What Is
the Standard of Care? | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 12 | |
| journal issue | 6 | |
| journal title | Journal of Management in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:6(40) | |
| tree | Journal of Management in Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 006 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |