Show simple item record

contributor authorEugene A. Miller
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:11:12Z
date available2017-05-08T21:11:12Z
date copyrightNovember 1996
date issued1996
identifier other%28asce%290742-597x%281996%2912%3A6%2840%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/41960
description abstractLitigation in the construction industry usually involves opinions about the “standard of care.” This paper discusses the problems with individual opinions, and describes three basic methods for determining a “standard of care”: (1) informal interviews; (2) formal interviews; and (3) work product audits. Methodology is discussed and examples of a questionnaire and checklists are presented. The results of some case histories and a correlative study lead to the writer's conclusion that a carefully conducted work product audit is the most reliable measure of the “standard of care.” An additional conclusion is that the “standard of care” is not sharply defined but encompasses a range of acceptable practices.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleWhat Is the Standard of Care?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:6(40)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record