Show simple item record

contributor authorGarratt, J. R.
date accessioned2017-06-09T15:26:03Z
date available2017-06-09T15:26:03Z
date copyright1995/05/01
date issued1995
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-4360.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4182401
description abstractThere is direct evidence that excess net radiation calculated in general circulation models at continental surfaces [of about 11?17 W m?2 (20%?27%) on an annual basis is not only due to overestimates in annual incoming shortwave fluxes [of 9?18 W m?2 (6%?9%)], but also to underestimates in outgoing longwave fluxes. The bias in the outgoing longwave flux is deduced from a comparison of screen-air temperature observations, available as a global climatology of mean monthly values, and model-calculated surface and screen-air temperatures. An underestimate in the screen temperature computed in general circulation models over continents, of about 3 K on an annual basis, implies an underestimate in the outgoing longwave flux, averaged in six models under study, of 11?15 W m?2 (3%?4%). For a set of 22 inland stations studied previously, the residual bias on an annual basis (the residual is the net radiation minus incoming shortwave plus outgoing longwave) varies between 18 and ?23 W m?2 for the models considered. Additional biases in one or both of the reflected shortwave and incoming longwave components cannot be ruled out.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleObserved Screen (Air) and GCM Surface/Screen Temperatures: Implications for Outgoing Longwave Fluxes at the Surface
typeJournal Paper
journal volume8
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<1360:OSAGST>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1360
journal lastpage1368
treeJournal of Climate:;1995:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record