contributor author | Li, Zhanqing | |
contributor author | Whitlock, Charles H. | |
contributor author | Charlock, Thomas P. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T15:24:28Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T15:24:28Z | |
date copyright | 1995/02/01 | |
date issued | 1995 | |
identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
identifier other | ams-4288.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4181600 | |
description abstract | Global datasets of surface radiation budget (SRB) have been obtained from satellite programs. These satellite-based estimates need validation with ground-truth observations. This study validates the estimates of monthly mean surface insolation contained in two satellite-based SRB datasets with the surface measurements made at worldwide radiation stations from the Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA). One dataset was developed from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) using the algorithm of Li et al. (ERBE/SRB), and the other from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) using the algorithm of Pinker and Laszlo and that of Staylor (GEWEX/SRB). Since the ERBE/SRB data contain the surface net solar radiation only, the values of surface insolation were derived by making use of the surface albedo data contained in the GEWEX/SRB product. The resulting surface insolation has a bias error near zero and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) between 8 and 28 W m?2. The RMSE is mainly associated with poor representation of surface observations within a grid cell. When the number of surface observations are sufficient, the random error is estimated to be about 5 W m?2 with present satellite-based estimates. In addition to demonstrating the strength of the retrieving method, the small random error demonstrates how well the ERBE derives the monthly mean fluxes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA). A larger scatter is found for the comparison of transmissivity than for that of insolation. Month to month comparison of insolation reveals a weak seasonal trend in bias error with an amplitude of about 3 W m?2. As for the insolation data from the GEWEX/SRB, larger bias errors of 5?10 W m?2 are evident with stronger seasonal trends and almost identical RMSEs. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Assessment of the Global Monthly Mean Surface Insolation Estimated from Satellite Measurements Using Global Energy Balance Archive Data | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 8 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<0315:AOTGMM>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 315 | |
journal lastpage | 328 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;1995:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |