Show simple item record

contributor authorDugan, J. P.
contributor authorStalcup, B. W.
date accessioned2017-06-09T15:07:25Z
date available2017-06-09T15:07:25Z
date copyright1988/02/01
date issued1988
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-350.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4172845
description abstractElectrical conductivity sensors are often used to obtain measurements of small-scale fluctuations, or microstructure, in the ocean. In applications on towed instrument packages, they provide the only way to estimate temperature fluctuations on scales down to about 1 cm. A number of designs for the sensors have emerged in the last few years which address the major requirements of the instruments, namely, high spatial resolution and freedom from fouling. Five specific designs are compared on the basis of these design objectives, with the intent of identifying those which most successfully reach the goals. A dual-needle cell is found to have very high spatial resolution, and a surface-mounted planar sensor is found to be most immune to fouling. Other sensors, such as the conductivity cell used in the Neil Brown Instrument Systems CTD, art found to be less optimum in this application.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComparison of Towed Conductivity Sensor Performance
typeJournal Paper
journal volume5
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1988)005<0116:COTCSP>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage116
journal lastpage122
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1988:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record