Show simple item record

contributor authorGuan, Hong
contributor authorCober, Stewart G.
contributor authorIsaac, George A.
contributor authorTremblay, André
contributor authorMéthot, André
date accessioned2017-06-09T15:02:59Z
date available2017-06-09T15:02:59Z
date copyright2002/12/01
date issued2002
identifier issn0882-8156
identifier otherams-3294.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4170556
description abstractIn situ aircraft measurements, collected during three research projects, are used to compare forecasts from three explicit cloud schemes. These schemes include the Canadian operational Sundqvist (SUND) scheme, the Tremblay mixed-phase (MIX) cloud scheme, and the Kong and Yau (KY) cloud scheme. The supercooled liquid water forecast accuracy is also determined for the MIX and KY schemes. For the entire in situ dataset, the three cloud forecast schemes show a similar skill in detecting the presence of clouds, with a true skill statistic ranging between 0.27 and 0.34. Quantitative comparisons of total cloud water content (TWC), supercooled liquid water content (SLWC), and ice water content (IWC) suggest that adjustments for autoconversion thresholds for precipitation formation within the different cloud microphysical schemes would improve forecasts of SLWC, IWC, and TWC.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComparison of Three Cloud Forecast Schemes with In Situ Aircraft Measurements
typeJournal Paper
journal volume17
journal issue6
journal titleWeather and Forecasting
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<1226:COTCFS>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1226
journal lastpage1235
treeWeather and Forecasting:;2002:;volume( 017 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record