Show simple item record

contributor authorRippeth, Tom P.
contributor authorSimpson, John H.
contributor authorWilliams, Eirwen
contributor authorInall, Mark E.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:55:55Z
date available2017-06-09T14:55:55Z
date copyright2003/09/01
date issued2003
identifier issn0022-3670
identifier otherams-29916.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4167196
description abstractSimultaneous measurements of the rates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) dissipation (ε) and production (P) have been made over a period of 24 h at a tidally energetic site in the northern Irish Sea in water of 25-m depth. Some ε profiles from ?5 m below the surface to 15 cm above the seabed were obtained using a fast light yo-yo (FLY) microstructure profiler, while P profiles were determined from a bottom-mounted high-frequency acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) using the variance method. In homogeneous flow of the kind observed, the turbulence regime should approximate to local equilibrium so that, with no buoyancy forces involved, ε and P are expected to covary with mean values that are equal. The results show a close tracking of ε and P for most of the observational period. For the second tidal cycle, when there was no significant surface wave activity, a mean ratio of ε/P ? 0.63 ± 0.17 was obtained. Although this is a significant deviation from unity, it is within the range of uncertainty previously reported for the ε measurements. A marked phase lag of between 5 and 20 min between the maximum P and the maximum ε is interpreted using a simple model in terms of the decay rate of TKE. Consideration of inherent instrument noise has enabled an estimate of the lowest P threshold measurable using the variance technique. For the chosen averaging parameters a value of Pmin ? 7 ? 10?5 W m?3 is estimated. Two other significant differences between the two sets of measurements are attributed to errors in the stress estimate. The first is a bias in the estimate of stress resulting from a combination of instrument tilt (1°?3.5°) and surface wave activity. The second are anomalously high stress estimates, covering nearly one-half of the water column at times, which are thought to be due to instrument noise associated with the large wave orbital velocities.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleMeasurement of the Rates of Production and Dissipation of Turbulent Kinetic Energy in an Energetic Tidal Flow: Red Wharf Bay Revisited
typeJournal Paper
journal volume33
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<1889:MOTROP>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1889
journal lastpage1901
treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;2003:;Volume( 033 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record