Show simple item record

contributor authorCushman-Roisin, Benoit
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:45:59Z
date available2017-06-09T14:45:59Z
date copyright1981/10/01
date issued1981
identifier issn0022-3670
identifier otherams-26283.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4163160
description abstractThe wind stress on the ocean surface induces horizontal advection and vertical mixing, two mechanisms which are capable of changing the surface water density. Advection and mixing can enhance or partially destroy the effects of each other. Frontogenesis due to convergent Ekman transports forced by a wind-stress field is one example. A bulk model for the study of advection and mixing in such circumstances is constructed from a one-dimensional model. Continuity of mass requires that water masses either downwell (convergence) or escape laterally (confluence). This distinction leads to a study of two extreme cases of frontogenesis, each herein treated separately. The model reduces to two coupled highly nonlinear prognostic equations for the mixed-layer buoyancy and mixed-layer depth. Scaling of the equations leads to the definition of a mixing parameter, a nondimensional number which measures the relative importance of advection and mixing. For large-scale ocean frontogenesis, this parameter is of the order of unity, implying that mixing is as efficient as advection. If the region of denser water is referred to as the north, the numerical results are: 1) the front is never symmetric; 2) in the case of weak mixing, the density jump across the pycnocline is stronger in the south and the mixed layer is deeper at the north, 3) in the case of strong mixing, the front is limited by a southern edge with a weak horizontal gradient to the south and a strong decreasing gradient to the north; 4) strong mixing can induce frontolysis south of the front, 5) after about one month, the Ekman downwelling resulting from convergence, if any, strongly controls the rate of deepening., and 6) frontal density gradients are about three times larger in the case of confluence than in the case of convergence. Because the emphasis is on the interaction between wind advection and wind stirring, both dissipation and surface buoyancy flux are neglected. Hence, the model does not reach a steady state and does not provide a length-scale for the width of the front.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleEffects of Horizontal Advection on Upper Ocean Mixing: A Case of Frontogenesis
typeJournal Paper
journal volume11
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(1981)011<1345:EOHAOU>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1345
journal lastpage1356
treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;1981:;Volume( 011 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record