Show simple item record

contributor authorSmith, Paul L.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:42:23Z
date available2017-06-09T14:42:23Z
date copyright1999/06/01
date issued1999
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-24881.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4161602
description abstractThis paper presents an analysis of the effects of shortcomings in the reporting of severe storm events on some common measures of warning performance. Such deficiencies lead to an apparent false alarm ratio (FAR) higher than the true value, and ordinarily to an apparent probability of detection (POD) also higher than the true value. An improved warning system may generate additional storm reports through closer collaboration between forecasters and storm spotters; an enhanced warning verification program will also tend to collect additional storm reports. Independently of any changes in the warning system, such additional reports tend to drive the apparent FAR down (and thus closer to the true value). If the verification efforts emphasize situations when warnings are in effect, the additional reports will further inflate the apparent POD. When changes occur in both the warning system and the verification program, the contributions of each to changes in the performance measures become intermingled. Understanding of these effects of the reporting system can aid in interpreting trends in the performance measures.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleEffects of Imperfect Storm Reporting on the Verification of Weather Warnings
typeJournal Paper
journal volume80
journal issue6
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<1099:EOISRO>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1099
journal lastpage1105
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;1999:;volume( 080 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record