Show simple item record

contributor authorEskridge, Robert E.
contributor authorKu, Jia Yeong
contributor authorRao, S. Trivikrama
contributor authorPorter, P. Steven
contributor authorZurbenko, Igor G.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:41:58Z
date available2017-06-09T14:41:58Z
date copyright1997/07/01
date issued1997
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-24747.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4161453
description abstractThe removal of synoptic and seasonal signals from time series of meteorological variables leaves datasets amenable to the study of trends, climate change, and the reasons for such trends and changes. In this paper, four techniques for separating different scales of motion are examined and their effectiveness compared. These techniques are PEST, anomalies, wavelet transform, and the Kolmogorov?Zurbenko (KZ) filter. It is shown that PEST and anomalies do not cleanly separate the synoptic and seasonal signals from the data as well as the other two methods. The KZ filter method is shown to have the same level of accuracy as the wavelet transform method. However, the KZ filter method can be applied to datasets with missing observations and is much easier to use than the wavelet transform method.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleSeparating Different Scales of Motion in Time Series of Meteorological Variables
typeJournal Paper
journal volume78
journal issue7
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<1473:SDSOMI>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1473
journal lastpage1483
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;1997:;volume( 078 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record