Show simple item record

contributor authorRussell, P. B.
contributor authorRedemann, J.
contributor authorSchmid, B.
contributor authorBergstrom, R. W.
contributor authorLivingston, J. M.
contributor authorMcIntosh, D. M.
contributor authorRamirez, S. A.
contributor authorHartley, S.
contributor authorHobbs, P. V.
contributor authorQuinn, P. K.
contributor authorCarrico, C. M.
contributor authorRood, M. J.
contributor authorÖström, E.
contributor authorNoone, K. J.
contributor authorvon Hoyningen-Huene, W.
contributor authorRemer, L.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:37:29Z
date available2017-06-09T14:37:29Z
date copyright2002/02/01
date issued2002
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-23043.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4159561
description abstractAerosol single scattering albedo ? (the ratio of scattering to extinction) is important in determining aerosol climatic effects, in explaining relationships between calculated and measured radiative fluxes, and in retrieving aerosol optical depths from satellite radiances. Recently, two experiments in the North Atlantic region, the Tropospheric Aerosol Radiative Forcing Observational Experiment (TARFOX) and the Second Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-2), determined aerosol ? by a variety of techniques. The techniques included fitting of calculated to measured radiative fluxes; retrievals of ? from skylight radiances; best fits of complex refractive index to profiles of backscatter, extinction, and size distribution; and in situ measurements of scattering and absorption at the surface and aloft. Both TARFOX and ACE-2 found a fairly wide range of values for ? at midvisible wavelengths (?550 nm), with 0.85 ≤ ?midvis ≤ 0.99 for the marine aerosol impacted by continental pollution. Frequency distributions of ? could usually be approximated by lognormals in ?max ? ?, with some occurrence of bimodality, suggesting the influence of different aerosol sources or processing. In both TARFOX and ACE-2, closure tests between measured and calculated radiative fluxes yielded best-fit values of ?midvis of 0.90 ± 0.04 for the polluted boundary layer. Although these results have the virtue of describing the column aerosol unperturbed by sampling, they are subject to questions about representativeness and other uncertainties (e.g., thermal offsets, unknown gas absorption). The other techniques gave larger values for ?midvis for the polluted boundary layer, with a typical result of ?midvis = 0.95 ± 0.04. Current uncertainties in ? are large in terms of climate effects. More tests are needed of the consistency among different methods and of humidification effects on ?.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleComparison of Aerosol Single Scattering Albedos Derived by Diverse Techniques in Two North Atlantic Experiments
typeJournal Paper
journal volume59
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0609:COASSA>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage609
journal lastpage619
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2002:;Volume( 059 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record