Show simple item record

contributor authorZhang, Guifu
contributor authorVivekanandan, J.
contributor authorBrandes, Edward A.
contributor authorMeneghini, Robert
contributor authorKozu, Toshiaki
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:33:13Z
date available2017-06-09T14:33:13Z
date copyright2003/08/01
date issued2003
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-2152.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4157868
description abstractThe three-parameter gamma distribution n(D) = N0Dµ exp(??D) is often used to characterize a raindrop size distribution (DSD). The parameters µ and ? correspond to the shape and slope of the DSD. If µ and ? are related to one another, as recent disdrometer measurements suggest, the gamma DSD model is simplified, which facilitates retrieval of rain parameters from remote measurements. It is important to determine whether the µ?? relation arises from errors in estimated DSD moments, or from natural rain processes, or from a combination of both statistical error and rain physics. In this paper, the error propagation from moment estimators to rain DSD parameter estimators is studied. The standard errors and correlation coefficient are derived through systematic error analysis. Using numerical simulations, errors in estimated DSD parameters are quantified. The analysis shows that errors in moment estimators do cause correlations among the estimated DSD parameters and cause a linear relation between estimators ?? and ??. However, the slope and intercept of the error-induced relation depend on the expected values µ and ?, and it differs from the µ?? relation derived from disdrometer measurements. Further, the mean values of the DSD parameter estimators are unbiased. Consequently, the derived µ?? relation is believed to contain useful information in that it describes the mean behavior of the DSD parameters and reflects a characteristic of actual raindrop size distributions. The µ?? relation improves retrievals of rain parameters from a pair of remote measurements such as reflectivity and differential reflectivity or attenuation, and it reduces the bias and standard error in retrieved rain parameters.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Shape–Slope Relation in Observed Gamma Raindrop Size Distributions: Statistical Error or Useful Information?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume20
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1106:TSRIOG>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1106
journal lastpage1119
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2003:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record