Show simple item record

contributor authorMoore, G. W. Kent
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:25:46Z
date available2017-06-09T14:25:46Z
date copyright1985/07/01
date issued1985
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-19091.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4155169
description abstractMost conventional wave-CISK models have been used in the study of circulations with aspect ratios less than one, and as a result have been hydrostatic. In general, the most unstable waves in the models are the small-scale high frequency ones. For these waves the hydrostatic assumption is invalid. It therefore seems appropriate to consider a model in which the high aspect ratio waves are treated correctly, i.e., a nonhydrostatic one. In this paper, a comparison between a hydrostatic and a nonhydrostatic wave-CISK model is made. In the hydrostatic model, there is no coupling of the horizontal and vertical scales of the waves and this results in its lack of scale selection. The nonhydrostatic model has an explicit coupling in it and this leads to a preferred scale for the growth of the waves. For all the cases considered, the most unstable wave has an aspect ratio of order one.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleA Comparison of Hydrostatic and Nonhydrostatic Wave-CISK
typeJournal Paper
journal volume42
journal issue14
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<1510:ACOHAN>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage1510
journal lastpage1520
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1985:;Volume( 042 ):;issue: 014
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record