Show simple item record

contributor authorAnagnostou, Emmanouil N.
contributor authorMorales, Carlos A.
contributor authorDinku, Tufa
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:23:09Z
date available2017-06-09T14:23:09Z
date copyright2001/04/01
date issued2001
identifier issn0739-0572
identifier otherams-1837.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4154367
description abstractSince the successful launch of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite, measurements of a wide variety of precipitating systems have been obtained with unprecedented detail from the first space-based radar [precipitation radar (PR)]. In this research, a methodology is developed that matches coincident PR and ground-based volume scanning weather radar observations in a common earth parallel three-dimensional Cartesian grid. The data matching is performed in a way that minimizes uncertainties associated with the type of weather seen by the radars, grid resolution, and differences in radar sensitivities, sampling volumes, viewing angles, and radar frequencies. The authors present comparisons of reflectivity observations from the PR and several U.S. weather surveillance Doppler radars (WSR-88D) as well as research radars from the TRMM field campaigns in Kwajalein Atoll and the Large Biosphere Atmospheric (LBA) Experiment. Correlation values above 0.8 are determined between PR and ground radar matched data for levels above the zero isotherm. The reflectivity difference statistics derived from the matched data reveal radar systems with systematic differences ranging from +2 to ?7 dB. The authors argue that the main candidate for systematic differences exceeding 1 to 1.5 dB is the ground radar system calibration bias. To verify this argument, the authors used PR comparisons against well-calibrated ground-based systems, which showed systematic differences consistently less than 1.5 dB. Temporal analysis of the PR versus ground radar systematic differences reveals radar sites with up to 4.5-dB bias changes within periods of two to six months. Similar evaluation of the PR systematic difference against stable ground radar systems shows bias fluctuations of less than 0.8 dB. It is also shown that bias adjustment derived from the methodology can have significant impact on the hydrologic applications of ground-based radar measurements. The proposed scheme can be a useful tool for the systematic monitoring of ground radar biases and the studying of its effect.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Use of TRMM Precipitation Radar Observations in Determining Ground Radar Calibration Biases
typeJournal Paper
journal volume18
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0616:TUOTPR>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage616
journal lastpage628
treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record