| contributor author | Anagnostou, Emmanouil N. | |
| contributor author | Morales, Carlos A. | |
| contributor author | Dinku, Tufa | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T14:23:09Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T14:23:09Z | |
| date copyright | 2001/04/01 | |
| date issued | 2001 | |
| identifier issn | 0739-0572 | |
| identifier other | ams-1837.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4154367 | |
| description abstract | Since the successful launch of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite, measurements of a wide variety of precipitating systems have been obtained with unprecedented detail from the first space-based radar [precipitation radar (PR)]. In this research, a methodology is developed that matches coincident PR and ground-based volume scanning weather radar observations in a common earth parallel three-dimensional Cartesian grid. The data matching is performed in a way that minimizes uncertainties associated with the type of weather seen by the radars, grid resolution, and differences in radar sensitivities, sampling volumes, viewing angles, and radar frequencies. The authors present comparisons of reflectivity observations from the PR and several U.S. weather surveillance Doppler radars (WSR-88D) as well as research radars from the TRMM field campaigns in Kwajalein Atoll and the Large Biosphere Atmospheric (LBA) Experiment. Correlation values above 0.8 are determined between PR and ground radar matched data for levels above the zero isotherm. The reflectivity difference statistics derived from the matched data reveal radar systems with systematic differences ranging from +2 to ?7 dB. The authors argue that the main candidate for systematic differences exceeding 1 to 1.5 dB is the ground radar system calibration bias. To verify this argument, the authors used PR comparisons against well-calibrated ground-based systems, which showed systematic differences consistently less than 1.5 dB. Temporal analysis of the PR versus ground radar systematic differences reveals radar sites with up to 4.5-dB bias changes within periods of two to six months. Similar evaluation of the PR systematic difference against stable ground radar systems shows bias fluctuations of less than 0.8 dB. It is also shown that bias adjustment derived from the methodology can have significant impact on the hydrologic applications of ground-based radar measurements. The proposed scheme can be a useful tool for the systematic monitoring of ground radar biases and the studying of its effect. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | The Use of TRMM Precipitation Radar Observations in Determining Ground Radar Calibration Biases | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 18 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0616:TUOTPR>2.0.CO;2 | |
| journal fristpage | 616 | |
| journal lastpage | 628 | |
| tree | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |