Show simple item record

contributor authorWebster, Peter J.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:22:46Z
date available2017-06-09T14:22:46Z
date copyright1982/01/01
date issued1982
identifier issn0022-4928
identifier otherams-18268.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4154254
description abstractTwo apparently contradictory situations are provided by observations of the atmospheric response to sea surface temperature anomalies. These are: (i) The extratropical regions of the winter hemisphere appear to possess strong teleconnections with equatorial forcing but weak or non-existent connections with local (extratropical) heating anomalies. (ii) The extratropical regions of the, summer hemisphere are quite sensitive to local thermal forcing but apparently unaffected by the remote forcing from equatorial regions. An attempt is made to provide a consistent physical picture which simultaneously embraces these two situations. With the aid of a simple linear model it is shown that the summer hemisphere is more sensitive to local forcing than the winter hemisphere because it is closer to the diabatic limit of Webster (1981), thus allowing an efficient energy generation. The winter hemisphere is much closer to the adjective limit. The sensitivity of the midlatitudes to remote (equatorial) forcing is shown to be a function of the relative location of the SSTA (sea surface temperature anomaly) to the zeros of the basic flow and the magnitude of the midlatitude westerlies. A hemisphere will become excited by remote forcing if at least part of the low-latitude sea surface temperature anomaly is located in the weak subtropical westerlies. Given that the latter criterion is met it is shown that the amplitude of the response and the latitude to which a particular mode is transmitted depends upon the distribution of westerly winds. The specific situation of El Niño sea surface temperature forcing is considered relative to realistic seasonal mean zonal wind fields. The model response is compared with the gross features of the observed anomalous atmosphere during El Niño years and a correspondence found. Finally, it is argued that the explanation of seasonality in atmospheric response offered in this paper will allow seasonal climate forecasting to be approached with an a priori physical expectation.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleSeasonality in the Local and Remote Atmospheric Response to Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies
typeJournal Paper
journal volume39
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<0041:SITLAR>2.0.CO;2
journal fristpage41
journal lastpage52
treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1982:;Volume( 039 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record